Posted by: seanxc on: April 23, 2009
It is often obvious when the client is the copywriter for their companies tagline. But seldom is the result this aggregious.
“Experience the power of the source of all your paper, packaging and facility needs. – Unisource.”
Wow. I really should not have to make any comment. “the power of the source” ? Huh? Yeah yeah I GET the horrendous pun but seriously, it makes my ears bleed. Yes, it does convey something about them and what they do… but in 14 words?
They were trying too hard. Puns are the copywriting hack equivalent of condom dispensers in bathrooms. If you’re at the point you have to use one, god help you.
They are created in advertising by lower level intellects who do the word jumble every week, and not the NYT crossword puzzle. They want to show how clever they are that they ‘got it’ immediately… In what they don’t know is demonstrating their intellectual inferiority.
It’s a slightly higher level version of the retarded kid with the shiny blue ribbon. So excited they are.
There is a reason that copywriting, especially taglines, should be left up to people who actually know words not in See Spot Run books. It’s an art of precise communication.
The tagline is not so you get it, it’s so your consumer quickly and succinctly gets the message.
Yes, the above tagline does communicate that they are in paper and facilities. But it does communicate anything differentiating. “the power?” you could insert any brand into that because it does not communicate anything. It just sounds cool.
“The power of communication”
“The power of knowing your customer”
“The power of technology”
“The power of being there for you”
“The power of power management”
It’s just linguistic bullshit and does not mean anything. But it’s a nice big testosterone ladden word.
You get what you pay for.
Posted by: seanxc on: April 19, 2009
So while debating with someone who started to spew statistics about FriendFinder and how they have so many emails and registered users I was reminded of a basic axiom in advertising… “Sex Sells”
FriendFinder (the company) is basically Penthouse. The vast majority of their network, as far as members and subscriptions, is sex based sites. AdultFriendFinder, Penthouse, Xfinder, etc… and the majority of them are run against the same back end system. However, they also engage in fairly nefarious practices when reporting numbers… their affiliate model feeds people into the “sex” based brands.
It’s a fine model to attempt to replicate IF you have the allure of “sex,” or other highly impulse product where it is easy to get someone’s registration data because they are, for lack of a better word, horny. The majority of those sites are populated with people who are offering escort services (as women) and the “john’s” as the male registrations. They do not realize they are John’s until they start to contact the women on the site.
These are NOT dating sites, but sites you go to to find sex… well, it’s a date you have to pay for, but don’t have to buy them flowers.
The “Friend” based safer brands, as well as all of the verticals, AsianFriendFinder etc… are a fraction of a fraction of the ongoing registrations. They are fed by the affiliate network model of the sex sites in a cascade marketing model. i.e. An affiliate has to run a certain number of ads toward the registration of those sites. It’s the impulse registrations on the sex sites (which immediately request upgrades to higher levels) that feed the entire system.
Without the “sex” sites, the entire model evaporates as there is not the money for the affiliates to just feed. Match.com and it’s affiliates under IAC have similar models for driving registrations. Many of the same affiliates participated in both. However, they found that the “sex” model makes them more money. Also, as an affiliate should, but more often than not does not follow brand guidelines of the site they are promoting, they do a massive disservice to the actual brand equity. As in, they will advertise via Black Hat SEO practices etc…with ads that say “Free Sex” etc… Now if you’re a site that basically makes all it’s money off of these practices you really do not care. However, Match.com was spending so much time policing affiliates that were bad and hurting the brand that they had to scrap the program and start over.
The sex model is a quick hit designed to sucker someone into signing up once, for three months. The abandonment rate is over 95% after that time.
Now, the many smaller sites as entery points, all designed and using SEO to have high organic ranking for specific terms is a good idea if you do no care about brand, but just about making money, and can cycle through various sites repeatedly.
Omniture, and other companies specialize in multivariate testing of “doorway” pages designed to maximize the profit potential of the funnel, however, to do this correctly costs a lot of money.
In the end if you are looking at example like FriendFinder and think “We can do that model with our product!,” unless your product is naked women willing to have sex for money… probably not.
Sex, for lack of a better word, sells… because it is a hidden desire that no one really talks about. The internet was almost custom crafted with its one-to-one consumption model to take over the escort business. It’s unlikely that YOUR product is as alluring.
Posted by: seanxc on: April 19, 2009
You are not a Republican. You are not a Democrat. You are not your car, your house, your jewelry. Your double-latte-decaf. You are not the health club you belong to. You are definitely NOT your religion. You are not better than anyone else, nor are you worse than you believe. You are not your body reflected in a mirror, your dress size, or what you eat.
For if you believe any of those things than you are not connected to those around you. And that lack of connection is what is causing your pessimism. Nothing more, nothing less.
Connection = Hope.
Get out of your head. Get into your body and feel. Feel the connection of others. Hope is the fuel that drives our nation, our economy. Today feels different than yesterday in a way you can’t explain, for hope does not reside in any logical statistic, or powerpoint chart. It’s palpable. Not being able to quantify it does not mean that it doesn’t exist.
Branding = hope, and our country was in desperate need of remembering what our brand stood for. We are not powerful because of weapons, but ideals. Ideals that cannot be sacrificed for expedience sake.
Arrogance, elitism, and isolation are but the ideals of fools in insecure skins. It is in our humility we are most powerful. It is where the brand, USA, is most powerful. The man who said “we can’t” will never go anywhere. He will sit there dreaming of days gone by, instead of building the future. For to him: The economy still is in shambles. The world is a disaster area. We still massively over-consume and pollute.
You are not a lot of things. But what you are is a little piece of the meme that is USA, regardless of whether you are American. Why? The feeling. The energy. Is hope.
Have your brand stand for something that is bigger than the little product you produce. Have it be unique to you, but resonate with all. Have your brand be “Hope.” Make your brand about “Connecting” with consumers. Make your brand “Real.” Be more concerned with what you are doing, and less concerned whether anyone hears about it, and you’ll never need some two bit hack advertiser to make your brand anything…. for your brand is you.
Posted by: seanxc on: February 28, 2009
I was debating the issue with Dane Madsen on The Internet Oldtimers List . regarding the Gallup Poll on who people trust. Needless to say, Marketers did not fare too well… These are his words…
In any industry there are bad actors. I spent 20 years in financial services (see “stock brokers” on the Gallup list) and have had nearly 1500 work with and for me during that time. I know that 99% are highly thoughtful, highly ethical, and so many that have actually made a significant difference in their clients lives. They are invited to the birthdays, weddings, wakes, and funerals. However, I spent 12 of those years in an activist role with the NASD and NYSE regulatory committees using what power I could harness to exclude those that rose to the level of unethical and, to the extent of that power, banish them from the business forever. I was often vetoed by counsel in the selection process because of my reputation for activism. I did not want these people fined, I wanted them capped in the parking lot and their body left as a warning for others. This was a position I took for the unethical as well as the simply stupid. Unfortunately, stupidity is still not a capital offense.
We do not have that same power here, but we maintain a digital wall of silence much as policemen that never out a bad actor, and come to find out from a very close friend who is a teacher, teachers as well – call it the chalk board wall of silence. In short, we protect our own not because we do not want them gone, but from the fear of reprisal. I again recall a member of our list that was forced to post a painful retraction for statements made about brands that embraced Gator or another adware group about 8 or 9 years ago. He was right and the Brands knew that, but outing them was a trail of tears that will silence that sort of opinion forever. There is no honor in whistle blowing, unfortunately, only pain and derision. It is also why anything posted on this list must never flow to the outside.
“If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas” should be square in our mind – and as a group be unwilling to continue with those that reflect badly on us specifically and the industry as a whole. This should extend to those clients that want to participate in such bad acts. If you warn them, and they want to continue, do you have the personal integrity to fire them as a client? A pyrrhic victory for certain, but looking in the mirror is easier. In this litigious society, we cannot take the risk of outing a bad actor, but at the very least we owe it to ourselves to not participate.
This is just my opinion. I could be wrong.
Dane Madsen
Posted by: seanxc on: February 28, 2009
People who talk about the death of email are generally in businesses that make money in other segments for which the success of email is an impediment to their success.
They tend to focus on rather a small segment that has changed their communication patterns, their immediate group, or family… They forget that currently there’s no alternative to communicate in a formal way other than email. If the alternative comes along then email will be dead, like letter writing is in business today.
Where the conversation has shifted away from email is “chat’ing.”
Email preceded the onslaught of SMS, and IM, and it was therefore used for a time for more informal quick communications. That has shifted to SMS and IM.
The hinderance in IM has been the many competing systems. We still do not have a universal IM system that reaches everyone via one IM account… at least in the way that your telephone number and SMS does.
However the failure of SMS as it is usually country specific due to that limitation.
Email replaced the fax, and FedEx to a large degree for sending letters or business letter.
Are the failing of any of these a fault of the technology, or a lack of
experience of the user who is using the technology? Both. We take a technology and we poke prod and otherwise cajole it into forcing it to communicate the way we want to. SMS has been around for years, but it’s explosion has only been more recent. It was a beeper technology that has found a home among phones.
What we end up with is:
- SMS: National quick short personal and informative based communication.
- Email: Global long-form business and replacement for personal letter writing. Attachment laden communication for transferring documents as replacement for FedEx. Email moves message but it is very sloppy with what it does with data afterwards. Everyone still has to come up with their own ways of saving, accessing, keeping track of that information, as well as figuring out how to create reminders, ticklers, action plans etc. Email is sensationally bad at all of this.
- IM: Global instant distraction from work. Less intrusive than phone call. Easier than walking down hall for multi-threaded conversation. IM is far better for “you have time for a quick question?,” when in reality the asynchronous nature of time attention would serve that question being answered when we have time, however in IM the initial IM’er is the “top,” while the receiver is the “bottom” in communications.
- Wiki’s: Far better for sharing information, but the open collaborative power dynamic is alien to those who use IM and TXT to control what they want, when they want it. The Wiki is confusing to them as they are inward focused. However, Wiki’s are still a transitional technology for personal and business communication. Wikipedia demonstrated the value en mass of harnessing the masses as a global consciousness, however for business purposes and personal communication they need to get a certain amount of traction before being adopted. They mainly sit as albatrosses once setup as a storage place where ideas go to die.
Email is a billion dollar segment that keeps growing, and with behavioral targeting getting more sophisticated, I don’t see that growth diminishing any time soon.
You see, we use all of these mediums on how it is most convenient for us to communicate. Not what is most convenient for the person receiving the communication. We are selfish time starved beings who extract what we want from communications.
It is a societal reflection of the segmenting media market. Have an issue with someone? Then you are not as likely to call as you are to use email. You are lobbing a communication hand grenade. A hot potato that you do not want to touch. Get a TXT you do not want to respond to? Then you “just got it” hours later when you respond… We lie, mask our feelings and do not want confrontation.
You know what? Pick up the phone, call someone, and listen. It’s still the best form of distant communication we have going for us.
“Reach out and touch someone.”
Posted by: seanxc on: February 27, 2009
- In a down economy, the more direct forms of advertising are the last to get cut
- Only outsource if you fully understand the nuances of SEM
- SEM technology is more advanced than just Google keywords
- SEM companies are focused on SEM. You are not
Outsourcing your search engine marketing is how you will blow through your numbers and cut your expenses. SEM will be what saves you and why we all still have jobs in three years. SEM, the bane of the advertising business, the glorified version of classified ads, the medium that has removed creativity from advertising and replaced it with this –

– is going to keep you and your department employed.
It is your life-raft in an economy that wants to chew you up and spit you out. Why? Because SEM is precision-driven ROI: Money goes in, money comes out. In a down economy, the more direct forms of advertising are the last to get cut.
If you believe differently, imagine a world where all we have are banners, rich media, microsites, social media, and mobile. This would greatly decrease the perception that our medium is useful for business. SEM is what gives the entire internet advertising industry credibility. Every other online ad format is along for the ride.
First of all, stop patting yourself on the back with how great your SEM program is. By the time a consumer types in a keyword, they’ve already decided what they’re looking for. They see a television commercial, a print ad, billboard, and coffee sleeve, all with your company logo, then go online and type something into Google to find it. Was SEM the root cause of the conversion? Of course not, but you are sure going to take credit for it.
Let that sink in. You’re just not as good as you think you are, and more importantly, the rest of the formats online are just not as effective as we need. SEM is what gives most companies the freedom to experiment with other media online.
SEM is important to the entire online ad industry, and staffing — how you staff, what staff you have, and what their key competencies are — is the key determiner for outsourcing. If are not already outsourcing your SEM program, then you may believe:
- You don’t need to because you know your business better than everyone else (a routinely false assumption)
- You are really behind the curve (sadly common)
- Outsourcing would cut the power base of whoever is in charge of SEM at your company (strangely common)
There are several reasons why should almost always outsource SEM or “insource” the technology for it.
When should you outsource?
Outsourcing is a business decision about the relative benefits of outsourcing versus in-house. It’s not a black-and-white issue, but exists in that wonderful grey land of “It depends.” Whatever the case, you should never outsource anything you do not fully understand, particularly when it is a significant part of your expenses. If you do, you will never understand how to manage the outsource relationship. Outsourcing is not a replacement for intelligence. You are the scientist, the creator, the lab genius. Outsourcing is the staff you have to do your research, and it’s funded by the research itself. If you are in charge of SEM without truly understanding it, then you better hire someone with a visceral knowledge and you better be able to understand and learn from them. They are not a replacement for you — otherwise you’re just outsourcing to someone internal rather than external.
“It depends”
The type of outsourcing you engage in also depends on what type of company you are.
Large clients who spend millions of dollars a month across multiple domains often completely outsource some verticals. In other cases they lease technology and occasionally use services a-la-carte. They are smart enough to know when it makes sense to outsource. Even their fully outsourced business units are sufficiently staffed to communicate heavily with the outsourced team. They take advantage of the synergies among media types, the benefits of landing page testing, and the general-offer testing that results in higher conversions.
Outsourcing is intrinsically tied to staffing. Case in point: A travel-related website was dramatically increasing its paid search spend to drive inquiries to its advertisers. They had very focused needs and had been testing a system that had the same spend, but were seeing nothing particularly special in results. They were habitual tinkerers and thought they could improve the paid/natural inquiries.
They were introduced to Marin Software, a do-it-yourself version where your in-house people use the platform. But Marin also brought relationships and expertise that smoothed the road into the usual search suspects.
Coincidently, the travel company experienced a cash flow problem and cut its budget pretty deeply for a while. As a necessity, the company started looking closer at the traffic it had and discovered that it could radically increase natural search functions with better optimization. As a result, they are spinning up the paid search campaign again, and with more attention to detail and talented technologists the company will get 100 percent of the traffic it needs for the model to work, at 25 percent of the cost. However, that comes at the expense of staffing internally.
Importing technology into an enterprise and having the staff to utilize it is “in-sourcing.” You get to control the technology more discretely and make more rapid changes, but at a cost — internal employees. This is still infinitely better than trying to build a system from scratch.
To accurately predict your savings, your SEM cost should always calculate the additional internal resources to run that technology. Unfortunately, most companies view employee costs as a “soft cost” that is not calculated into this figure. When you outsource something critical, you may find that the 10 to 15 percent (approximate outsource fees) actually costs more than you ever thought. Before you outsource, hire a consultant to guide you in this effort. It will likely be the best money you ever spend.
Why don’t you build your own system?
Companies that specialize in SEM spend money — a lot of money — on technology that they can distribute over a wide variety of clients. Unless you are an eBay or an Amazon, both of which have a slew of technologists with a fundamental understanding of online, it’s a fools’ errand.
Companies build so little of their other key software (ERP, CRM, accounting, ecommerce, etc.) and instead customize the data flow in and out of these applications. Why they think APIs into the search engines require that they build the whole campaign management suite is beyond me. Most likely you’ll have what you need for one millisecond, and then your technology will slowly fade into techno-archaic land. Or worse, you create a system that requires so much ongoing upkeep and modification that detaching it from your internal process becomes next to impossible. I’ve yet to see an in-house technology solution that comes close to even the least effective, slowest, and least exciting competition.
Often it happens because someone runs a test with a limited number of keywords and generates a profit. The mistake they make is then scaling that test based on estimates of what they could make if they built their system internally.
I have watched countless agencies and clients go down the same road. Internal arrogance makes them say, “No one knows our business like us!” That statement is true, but often it turns into a land grabbing war. SEM is so profitable, with such minimal effort compared to other marketing programs, that the person handling SEM gets lionized. Even a highly trained monkey can make a select group of keywords profitable, but it’s not about that. It’s about scalability and going from a handful of keywords to thousands.
Why should I outsource?
Strong technology. SEM has stretched far beyond just the technology of bidding systems in Google. External resources continue to invest in technology that will improve their efficiency so they can be more profitable. Their continual investment in technology is spread over a wide range of clients, and thus is a more efficient use of those dollars. Your company will never invest what is necessary to continually upgrade the technology; it’s just not efficient to. If you are spending and continually sinking money into technology in an internal SEM program, you are wasting resources. The only reason you are probably getting away with it is that SEM is so profitable on the whole that you still make money.
However, you are eating into your own profitability pie. Your company is not in business to make SEM. Your company makes products or has a service. That is your expertise; stick with it.
The algorithms in use by the major players are rapidly becoming more and more intelligent. When Google makes a change, they rapidly adjust their systems to compensate. They employ more people who actually call themselves “scientists,” with more pocket protectors than you have. How many scientists are on your staff? Remember that kid in the back of class who was a social leper but went to CalTech or MIT on a full scholarship? They work at these big search players.
Their systems are designed to make their companies more efficient, automating as much as possible. That allows the systems to scale your programs efficiently. The problem I outlined earlier, of linearly scaling value of a non-linear system? Strong technology solves that problem. The real competitive value in SEM is the long-tail. There are keyword combinations that are not searched often, but, if you have enough of them, create real value. It’s where your competition is least likely to play, and thus where you can get the most value.
But what their technology really provides is a different business model for you. Most clients, unfortunately, concentrate on the bid price for each keyword. This is both inefficient and does nothing for your business. Think about it. It is not the bid price that it is important to you, it is the conversion price. Buying 10,000 keywords at 5 cents apiece is irrelevant if no one buys your product. These systems dynamically adjust your bid pricing based on conversions.
What does that mean?
It’s simple. When a consumer buys a product at your site or goes to any page you consider a conversion, the SEM company places a pixel on that landing page. These are often called “thank you” pages and display something along the lines of “thank you for your purchase.” The company knows which keyword landed at that page and caused the conversion. You can attach a value to that conversion, so the system dynamically adjusts the bid pricing for that keyword. That keyword, in essence, is more valuable. If, for example, that keyword cost $1, and the value you set for that conversion is less, it will adjust your bid pricing to get more customers, maximizing its effect. It’s the conversion that matters, because that is what impacts your business. You could be getting lots of clicks on 10-cent keywords, but it does not matter that they cost less if none of them covert. They actually cost your business more.
Even more unique is that some of these systems look at your keywords at a portfolio level and adjust the price to maximize customers across a whole range of keywords. It does all of this, and continually gets customers for you at the most efficient level. A human is just not able to make those decisions in a timely manner, nor is it efficient for them to do so.
An ability to use that technology
SEM outsourcing companies are in business for one reason: SEM. You are not. You are distracted by whatever is the latest priority of resources. I have watched several clients take their SEM in-house, and the technologists assigned to SEM are stretched thin with countless other internal projects. In addition, SEM is often falls under a marketer’s purview, and you and your staff just do not have the time or the resources to follow every little nuance in the search business. That is exactly what SEM firms do, and that is all they do. They manipulate algorithms and Google campaigns at a much more efficient clip than you can.
Have you ever launched a program on your computer that you have not used in awhile, and it takes time to get back up to speed? The people that work at these companies use their software repeatedly — they connect to their contacts at Google and the other engines regularly. They tinker, tweak, and manipulate their systems and your campaigns for success. They constantly test and control their systems and algorithms to perform. Being better is what keeps them in business. It’s a rare occurrence when a major company in the SEM spaces does not outperform, over time, the 10 to 15 percent it costs.
Wide knowledge of multiple industries
The company you decide to outsource to deals with many clients in many different industries, each with slightly different business models. Techniques emerge that work for one client and can be applied to others. Knowing more about your business does not translate into being able to run a more profitable SEM program. You know your company — too well in fact — making it almost impossible for you to understand what everyone else does not. An external view is often the best reality check you can get if you are willing to “begin as a beginner” and put yourself in the position of your customer.
You focus on your business and thus become myopic about it. Without continual infusion of external ideas and techniques, your program will often stagnate. The only real infusion of new ideas is usually the turnover of employees.

This is the landscape of the U.S. search market. The values are just approximations, but external systems can work with a wide array of search engines — and your campaigns on them — to maximize your overall business impact.
This is the only formula that matters in search: Value = (quantity * quality) / price. Outsourcing companies understand this formula. They do not focus on a single source of the search universe, but will counsel you on how your strategy with one search engine can be leveraged across many. Too often clients ignore this formula and concentrate solely on quality. This leads to ignoring the bottom-tier search networks, like LookSmart, as viable sources to increase dollars. Search is not television, and SEM companies understand it’s a mass long-tail play, where the value is not the customer, but the balance between quality and cost.
The “arrogance blip”
Of the many reasons to outsource, this is probably the one that will hit home the most. I call it the “arrogance blip.” You may not know the term, but you probably know the effect. So what is an arrogance blip? It’s the effect of hiring an entry-level person who works for one year in SEM, and then either leaves for a job that pays three times as much for their limited experience, or holds the SEM program hostage while they continue to work in discontent.
Understand that you are training someone to leave when they get trained in SEM. The field is too competitive and the need too great. If your program is all in-house, the arrogance blip is often a single point of failure. Don’t let your intellectual capital walk out the door when your employee does, safe-port it by outsourcing.
Who should you outsource to?
There are a number of different ways to run your SEM, and there are numerous companies in each category that can service that need. I have worked with many other companies beyond this in the SEM space, some good, some horrendous, and some even worse than that. Since I prefer to deal with real-world examples instead of ivory tower postulations, here are the ones I’d have no problem recommending if my job was on the line.
Marin Software makes the best application you can take internally to run your search program. They continually refine their system and provide the support you need to keep the system in-house. If you’re an online or traditional agency and your clients have not already abandoned you for an SEM agency, this is the application I would bring in-house. It saves you the development costs of the technology, it ensures your system is top-notch, and keeps the control and client dollars flowing through your door.
DidIt provides industrial-grade software, proprietary algorithms that enable dynamic bid pricing, and a full service staff. What more could you ask for? Didit lets you outsource just a portion, or your entire SEM program. They are so confident about their technology and service that they offer “performance trust accounts” whose values range up to $1,000,000. If the success metrics that are agreed upon are not met, funds from the PTA are distributed to you. Are your traditional or online agencies offering you that kind of guarantee? I didn’t think so. There is no such thing as a perfect agency, but put the right person from your company managing your campaign with them and you’ll be the better for it.
Efficient Frontier takes a slightly different take with their algorithm, basing it on a portfolio theory and applying predictive modeling similar to that of Wall Street hedge funds. Needless to say, it’s a lot smarter making SEM decisions than you or I will ever be. If you already have that rock star who understands the nuances of SEM, they’ll be able to direct EF to success.
Conclusion
Whatever you do, remember that the technology is the star in SEM. You may want to — and often should — keep employees internally to run the overall program. You need someone that knows how to leverage that technology. Remember, you should neveroutsource anything you do not fully understand, particularly when it is a significant part of your expenses.
What that means is that the best technology in the world will not solve your problem if you do not have the right people internally to leverage that technology from a strategic level, to a functional level.
Look, you can continue to convince yourself that designing your own internal system is the best way to go, and while there are exceptions, it’s just that you’re not likely one of them. Unless you plan on doing it by in-sourcing technology like Marin’s, you’re just being arrogant. Some may get defensive about how profitable their internally-run system is, and it may be, but given the right internal intelligence, it would be more profitable with the companies I recommend.
Posted by: seanxc on: November 25, 2008
This is a “Knowledge through SPAM” POST
A beautiful woman with an IQ equivalent to the combined intelligence of the three olives in her dirty martini asked what I did for a living. I could have just told her that I tell people like her what to think, so that they can mindlessly regurgitate. Then I realized, after my brain had checked-out during her half an hour non-stop babble between talking about shoes, and recanting what the pict-o-cube turned to FOX News said, that she was actually convinced she was not affected by what marketers do, and nothing would really convince her otherwise. FOX News confirmed to her that she was intelligent; a mindless media re-vomiter, and all was safe in the world.
Simplicity would be required. A very low-level of abstraction that I had not had to communicate with since I was in… oh, I don’t know… 5th grade? I struggled to figure how I could explain what I did in terms that this flesh-pod with arms (and a nice butt) could understand.
And then “SPAM to the rescue!” Sometimes SPAM is useful.. and this tasty tidbit comes to you from my copious SPAM files…
And so we begin…
You go to a party and you see an attractive woman across the room. You walk up to her and say “Hi, I’m great in bed, how ’bout it?”
This is an example of direct marketing.
You go to a party and you see an attractive woman across the room. You give your wing-man ten dollars to approach the attractive female and comment “Hi, my friend over there (pointing to you) is great in bed, how
’bout it?”
This is an example of advertising.
You go to a party and you see an attractive woman across the room. You give two of your female friends ten bucks each to stand within earshot of her and talk about how great you are in bed and what a great guy you are.
This is an example of PR.
You go to a party and you see an attractive female across the room. She immediately walks over and says, “Hi, I hear you’re great in bed, how ’bout it?”
This is an example of the power of branding.
Simple, direct, precise. Sometimes SPAM is more useful than you think. So, the next time you try and explain to someone what you do in marketing, just use this. It’s a lot easier and more precise an explanation than having them nod off somewhere between your strategic matrix discussion and your analytics discourse.
Posted by: seanxc on: November 21, 2008
Creativity in advertising is dying, and we sure as hell better wake up if we’re going to save it. The Toyota Halftime report, the Excedrin hard hit of the day, etc… ad-nauseam. “Ad” nauseam. That’s the state of our industry with respect to the consumer, nauseating. We are seriously only a clients’ prozac induced delusion away from the “Tampax Red Zone,” or the “Levitra Scoring Drive.” In a world that is increasingly driven by direct-response metrics, the art of advertising and marketing is being lost.
If you’re a Creative Director why don’t you just grab the nearest blunt object, stab yourself in the gut, and drag it across your belly until you bleed out on us. You’d be doing us all a favor you hypocritical sell-out. Remember when Creatives had balls and ran the agency instead of being subject to client whims. They whim’ed the client, and the client was in awe. When was the last time your client was in awe?
Rent “MadMen”… pour yourself a martini, and cry at what you’re not.
The goal of every ad should be to make that ad obsolete. To seed a meme that can grow on it’s own after the presentation of that advertising. If we are going to succeed the impact must last longer than the initial hit, otherwise, you will always have to advertise to sell your product, and that is not building a “brand,” it’s creating an addict.
There is no one right way, or one definitive statement of what is “great” advertising. It lives in a world of abstract perception, however, I will put my stake in the ground, and do it definitively, because that is what is required for good debate. And honest debate of these issues is what will move us to change our industry for the better.
Seek to create something bigger than the Ad; and continue to do so. Do not let the “No’s” dissuade you. Do not get beaten down. Do not try to create an ode to “film noire” as your art piece in advertising. Seek to create Advertising as Art form. The subtlety, the nuanced influence of meme transference. Continue to seek to do that, and you’ll never have to worry if anyone likes what you do. If your advertising sells your clients product long after that advertising ran… you have succeeded.
Success if not an award, a pat on the back, a raise, promotion or even a blow-job. Advertising Success… is immortality.